When 20 Cardiologists Resign, Contracts Decide Who Recruits

This analysis synthesizes 3 sources published the week ending Oct 15, 2026. Editorial analysis by the PhysEmp Editorial Team.

Twenty of the 27 cardiologists at the only cardiology practice in Schenectady County, New York, have sent resignation letters to their employer, according to Becker’s ASC. They plan to start at a rival hospital in January. The reason this belongs in Physician Recruiting & Hiring Insights is that nobody recruited twenty individuals. One hospital signed a team, and the contracts between two institutions determined whether it was allowed to.

A hiring event that ran through lawyers

The sequence matters. St. Peter’s Health Partners, an Albany-based Trinity Health system, acquired the practice in 2021. Merger talks with Ellis Medicine, the Schenectady hospital that now stands to gain the cardiologists, collapsed in June after six years. According to Becker’s reporting on Ellis’s August lawsuit, St. Peter’s gave notice on June 15 that it was ending the cardiology services agreement effective Dec. 14, and the physicians’ new employment agreements, effective Jan. 1, carried one-year noncompetes. Ellis argued those noncompetes conflict with its contractual right to hire the group once the services agreement ends.

The group is large enough that the stakes are not abstract. Ellis said the 27 cardiologists and 15 physician assistants serve more than 50,000 patients a year, and that about $75 million in annual procedure revenue could move elsewhere if it cannot employ them. The same filing put Ellis at roughly $50 million in cash, about 50 days, against about $70 million in debt. A hospital in that position is not running a recruiting search in the usual sense. It is acquiring a service line through hiring.

When the unit being hired is a practice rather than a person, time-to-fill stops being the relevant metric. The binding constraint is who holds the right to make the offer, and that right was set years earlier in a merger agreement.

What the January roster shows

By October the numbers had moved. Four cardiologists are staying with St. Peter’s and one has retired, so the departure is 20 of 27 rather than all of them. Ellis told Becker’s that the 20 have signed employment agreements for a Jan. 1 start, that ten advanced practice providers from the cardiology team have signed as well, and that it is recruiting two more cardiologists from outside Schenectady. It plans to use locum physicians during the transition.

A team move does not remove conventional recruiting. It shifts it to the edges: the two outside hires, the locum bridge, and the seven who did not resign. St. Peter’s says it expects no gap in coverage from mid-December into January. The reporting gives no volume or wait-time figures to test that against.

In September, St. Peter’s sought a restraining order barring Ellis from soliciting its cardiologists and described the departures as the product of a “poisoned recruitment campaign.” Ellis disputes that its outreach began before the termination notice. The New York Attorney General’s Office has since written to the presiding judge raising concerns that the noncompete could violate state antitrust law. Solicitation timing, not compensation, is what the litigation turns on.

The same mechanism in Lubbock, with a different trigger

A second case this week shows the constraint without a noncompete. KCBD reports that University Medical Center in Lubbock hired two OB-GYNs in 2021 and relied on the Texas Tech School of Medicine to grant them clinical faculty appointments, which doctors at UMC hospitals must hold. Both physicians have resigned. UMC says the School of Medicine will not grant appointments to their replacements, which in UMC’s telling ends its own OB-GYN practice. Texas Tech says state law limits UMC to employing hospital-based physicians in radiology, emergency medicine and hospital medicine, and that the 2021 hires violated that law and the parties’ coordinating agreement.

Texas Tech points to its own bench: 26 women’s health faculty in Lubbock, 12 of them obstetricians, with 18 of the 26 joining in the past two years. The article gives no patient volumes or wait times, so the effect on access cannot be measured from what has been reported.

Put the two cases side by side and the pattern is plain. In Schenectady, a contract blocks a group from moving. In Lubbock, an affiliation agreement blocks a hospital from replacing physicians who left. In both, the people are available and willing, and the paperwork between institutions decides whether they can be hired.

What mainstream coverage leaves out

Coverage of both stories has read as institutional conflict: a failed merger, a lawsuit, a land-reversion claim dating to 1969 legislation. That framing hides the recruiting economics. Physician supply is usually discussed as a pipeline problem. Oklahoma ranks 50th in physicians per capita, and a Senate interim study this week centered on residency slots, with Sen. John Haste noting that only about half of residents stay in the state after training.

Schenectady and Lubbock describe a different channel: experienced physicians changing employers in blocks, under contracts negotiated for other purposes. A system that built a service line around an acquired group, as St. Peter’s did in 2021, holds that group only as long as the paperwork does.

Employed physician groups carry a hidden expiration date in the agreements that brought them in. Executives who track vacancy counts but not the end dates of their services and affiliation contracts are measuring the wrong exposure.

Reading the contract before the offer

For physicians weighing an offer from an acquirer, the lesson is to ask what survives if the employer’s relationship with a partner institution ends. The Schenectady cardiologists signed new agreements in January, and a noncompete in them became the center of a case within the year. Ask early who holds the services, credentialing or faculty agreement that makes the job possible.

For executives and recruiters, Ellis’s approach suggests a team acquisition needs a plan for the margins: advanced practice providers alongside the physicians, outside cardiologists, locums for the transition. The Lubbock case shows the inverse risk. An employer that depends on a partner to credential its hires cannot refill a vacancy on its own timetable.

What to watch

The first number is the January start: whether all 20 cardiologists begin on Jan. 1 and the two outside hires arrive on Ellis’s schedule. The second is the court record. A ruling on whether the noncompete holds, with the Attorney General already raising antitrust concerns, will set expectations for any health system that acquired a practice and wrote restrictive terms into its contracts.

Sources

20 cardiologists resign amid New York health system legal battle – Becker’s ASC
UMC, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center trade statements in OB-GYN doctor dispute – KCBD
Sen. John Haste Leads Interim Studies on Physician Shortage, Strong Families Tax Credit – Oklahoma State Senate
Ellis Hospital sues St. Peter’s over cardiologist noncompetes, warns of $75M revenue risk – Becker’s ASC
St. Peter’s seeks injunction in cardiologist noncompete lawsuit – Becker’s ASC

Relevant articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Luctus quis gravida maecenas ut cursus mauris.

The best candidates for your jobs, right in your inbox.

We’ll get back to you shortly

By submitting your information you agree to PhysEmp’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use…