add directory ♦ travel nurse jobs
Today's News:
All Family Practice Jobs
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed Minnesota with Locum Medical Group
The VA in Minneapolis, Minnesota is in need of a Primary Care locum tenens physician for their facility. This assignment would begin November 1, 2008 and will continue through March 31, 2009. A Minnesota
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed New Mexico with Locum Medical Group
The VA is in urgent need of a Primary Care physician for their outpatient clinic in Gallup, New Mexico. Either a Family Practice or Internal Medicine physician will be accepted. The assignment will begin
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed North Carolina with Locum Medical Group
Locum Urgent Care Coverage is needed in western North Carolina for the following dates; Oct. 26th, Nov. 1st and Jan. 1st through 3rd. Hours are either 1 p.m.-9 p.m. or 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and you will see
Professional Issues
BCBS Compliance Dispute Program Now Operational
ann@aafp.org Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:00:00 -0500
Got a beef with a Blue Cross and Blue Shield health plan? Is it neglecting to fulfill all the terms of the legal settlement agreement reached about 18 months ago? Physicians who have such concerns and who did not opt out of the settlement agreement are encouraged to file compliance disputes under the compliance dispute program set forth in the terms of the agreement.
Study Examines Role of Retail Health Clinics
sporter@aafp.org Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:10:00 -0500
As the number of retail health clinics swells to more than 1,000 nationwide, new research suggests that the clinics may be emerging as safety net providers for patients who don't have a usual source of health care.
ACEP Position on Medical Home Sparks Forceful Response From AAFP
jarvantes@aafp.org Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:35:00 -0500
A recently issued position statement on the patient-centered medical home, or PC-MH, from the American College of Emergency Physicians, or ACEP, has elicited a firm response from the AAFP. The statement demonstrates ACEP's lack of understanding about the intent of the medical home and its true impact on the nation's health care system, says AAFP President Jim King, M.D., of Selmer, Tenn.
Family Medicine Notes
links for 2008-09-24
Jacob Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:32:34 -0000
Still a Ways to Go: Widespread EHR Adoption Remains Off in the Distance...
Gordon's RSS
Jacob Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:30:20 -0000
Poor John. He couldn't get an RSS feed out of google reader without a cookie. Enter Dappit Kinda nuts to get the RSS from what is essentially a screen-scrape of the HTML. Oh well .. in desperate times, we take...
links for 2008-09-22
Jacob Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:03:12 -0000
What's the Differerence Between an EHR (Electronic Health Record) and EMR (Electronic Medical Record)?...
links for 2008-09-21
Jacob Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:01:45 -0000
Accuracy and efficiency of computer-aided nursing ...[Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2008 Jul-Sep] - PubMed Result...
links for 2008-09-20
Jacob Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:30:31 -0000
"Obesity" and "Clinical Obesity". Men's understandings of obesity and its relation to the risk of diabetes: a qualitative study...
links for 2008-09-19
Jacob Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:30:26 -0000
USATF - America's Running Routes - View Route Run It. Map It. Share It. - A Database of America's Running Routes. Map and measure your favorite running routes and save them to the country's largest searchable database of running...
medpundit
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:22:00 -0000
Year's End, Blog's End: I've been making my annual year end inventory - deciding what to keep and what to toss. It's become obvious in the past several months that this blog is one of the things that it's time to toss. This will be the last post for Medpundit. Truly. Wishing you all the best in 2008 and the years beyond.Click to enlarge
Pilgrim Medicine
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:31:00 -0000
Thanksgiving Remembrance: Mayflower Medicine.
Genetic Prejudice
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:02:00 -0000
Any Excuse Will Do: Any excuse to justifying prejudice, or to stir up fear mongering of what may come: At the same time, genetic information is slipping out of the laboratory and into everyday life, carrying with it the inescapable message that people of different races have different DNA. Ancestry tests tell customers what percentage of their genes are from Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas. The heart-disease drug BiDil is marketed exclusively to African-Americans, who seem genetically predisposed to respond to it. Jews are offered prenatal tests for genetic disorders rarely found in other ethnic groups.Such developments are providing some of the first tangible benefits of the genetic revolution. Yet some social critics fear they may also be giving long-discredited racial prejudices a new potency. The notion that race is more than skin deep, they fear, could undermine principles of equal treatment and opportunity that have relied on the presumption that we are all fundamentally equal."We are living through an era of the ascendance of biology, and we have to be very careful," said Henry Louis Gates Jr., director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University. "We will all be walking a fine line between using biology and allowing it to be abused."We have been living in an era of ascendant biology since Darwin. Remember eugenics? Jews have been offered prenatal testing long before the mapping of the human genome, as have African-Americans. But prenatal screening is not quite the same as the eugenics movement heyday. So why the hyperventilating? It turns out that the Times is taking its cue from blogs commenting on studies studies like this. Well, if the blogs say that genetics justifies prejudice, it must be true! I never thought I would see the day that the New York Times took that attitude on its front pages. It must be part of their plan to join the internet age. Here's the part that's gotten the Times convinced that genetics is going to bring back the days of institutionalized prejudice:There exists a publicly available gene database, The HapMap Project, that contains random samples of genetic sequences from people in China, Japan, Nigeria, and people in the United States with European ancestry. It’s now possible to search the HapMap database for genes that have been linked with intelligence in published scientific studies. In this manner, we can determine if high intelligence genes occur with greater or lesser frequency in the various races.Now, here’s an interesting point. If even a single gene correlated with intelligence occurs with different frequencies in the different races, this alone proves that there are racial differences in intelligence. How is that? Well, the egalitarian theory holds that every race has identical intelligence. Therefore, whatever genes there are that affect intelligence, they must be distributed exactly equally in all human races. Once even a small race difference is proven, the egalitarian theory is proven false. At that point, it’s only a matter of determining which race has the higher average intelligence based on the genetic evidence.Oh, please. Here's a take home lesson for everyone on the science of genetics, and one that should never be forgotten - these studies are about associations of genes with traits, not the concrete coding of a trait by a given gene. Just because a locus on a chromosome can be found more often in people with schizophrenia than in the general population doesn't mean that everyone with that genetic code in that spot will have schizophrenia, anymore than it means that every sibling of a schizophrenic will have the disease. Ditto with intelligence. Ditto, too, with cancer risks and most other traits and diseases human genome mapping is linking to genes. The essence of a man is not written into his DNA. Here's another important point to remember - our science is still young and uncertain:These genomewide association studies have been able to examine interpatient differences in inherited genetic variability at an unprecedented level of resolution, thanks to the development of microarrays, or chips, capable of assessing more than 500,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a single sample. This "SNP-chip" technology capitalizes on a catalogue of common human genetic variations that is provided by the HapMap Project, which was made possible by the completion of the consensus human-genome sequence.......The main problem with this strategy is that, because of the high cost of SNP chips, most studies are somewhat constrained in terms of the number of samples and thus have limited power to generate P values as small as 10–7. In addition, most variants identified recently have been associated with modest relative risks (e.g., 1.3 for heterozygotes and 1.6 for homozygotes), and many true associations are not likely to exceed P values as extreme as 10–7 in an initial study. On the other hand, a "statistically significant" finding in an underpowered study is more likely to be a false positive result due to chance than is such a finding in an adequately powered study, and "statistically significant" associations could be attributable to systematic bias (e.g., from confounding due to ethnic ancestry, also known as population stratification). Thus, the sine qua non for belief in any specific result from a genomewide association study is not the strength of the P value in the initial study, but the consistency and strength of the association across one or more large-scale replication studies. Robust replication should permit the identification of true positive results and the weeding out of false positive results.In other words, take these genome studies that link intelligence and race just as about as seriously as you would take studies linking intelligence to sex, or that predict elections with brain scans.UPDATE: Best of the Web draws an important distinction:Note that "the presumption that we are all fundamentally equal" is quite different from the notion "that all races are equal." The former is a moral principle, a premise about the basic dignity of every individual; the latter is an empirical presumption about group averages in measurable traits. Someone with an IQ of 80 is as human as someone with an IQ of 120; and this is so regardless of whether the average IQ of one race is different from that of another.What worries people like those in the Times story is that racial differences in IQ or other traits seem to lend empirical support to racist theories. But those theories are qualitatively wrong, so that no empirical evidence could make them right. If all individuals are of equal dignity and worth regardless of IQ, then a group is not fundamentally superior or inferior to another group by virtue of differences in average IQ.It seems that some very smart people mistakenly think that intelligence is a measure of fundamental worth. Maybe they're a little too impressed with their own brilliance.
Subscribe to Journals RSS feed 
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed Minnesota with Locum Medical Group
The VA in Minneapolis, Minnesota is in need of a Primary Care locum tenens physician for their facility. This assignment would begin November 1, 2008 and will continue through March 31, 2009. A Minnesota
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed New Mexico with Locum Medical Group
The VA is in urgent need of a Primary Care physician for their outpatient clinic in Gallup, New Mexico. Either a Family Practice or Internal Medicine physician will be accepted. The assignment will begin
Permanent Family Practice Job in Not Disclosed North Carolina with Locum Medical Group
Locum Urgent Care Coverage is needed in western North Carolina for the following dates; Oct. 26th, Nov. 1st and Jan. 1st through 3rd. Hours are either 1 p.m.-9 p.m. or 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and you will see
Professional Issues
BCBS Compliance Dispute Program Now Operational
ann@aafp.org Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:00:00 -0500
Got a beef with a Blue Cross and Blue Shield health plan? Is it neglecting to fulfill all the terms of the legal settlement agreement reached about 18 months ago? Physicians who have such concerns and who did not opt out of the settlement agreement are encouraged to file compliance disputes under the compliance dispute program set forth in the terms of the agreement.
Study Examines Role of Retail Health Clinics
sporter@aafp.org Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:10:00 -0500
As the number of retail health clinics swells to more than 1,000 nationwide, new research suggests that the clinics may be emerging as safety net providers for patients who don't have a usual source of health care.
ACEP Position on Medical Home Sparks Forceful Response From AAFP
jarvantes@aafp.org Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:35:00 -0500
A recently issued position statement on the patient-centered medical home, or PC-MH, from the American College of Emergency Physicians, or ACEP, has elicited a firm response from the AAFP. The statement demonstrates ACEP's lack of understanding about the intent of the medical home and its true impact on the nation's health care system, says AAFP President Jim King, M.D., of Selmer, Tenn.
Family Medicine Notes
links for 2008-09-24
Jacob Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:32:34 -0000
Still a Ways to Go: Widespread EHR Adoption Remains Off in the Distance...
Gordon's RSS
Jacob Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:30:20 -0000
Poor John. He couldn't get an RSS feed out of google reader without a cookie. Enter Dappit Kinda nuts to get the RSS from what is essentially a screen-scrape of the HTML. Oh well .. in desperate times, we take...
links for 2008-09-22
Jacob Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:03:12 -0000
What's the Differerence Between an EHR (Electronic Health Record) and EMR (Electronic Medical Record)?...
links for 2008-09-21
Jacob Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:01:45 -0000
Accuracy and efficiency of computer-aided nursing ...[Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2008 Jul-Sep] - PubMed Result...
links for 2008-09-20
Jacob Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:30:31 -0000
"Obesity" and "Clinical Obesity". Men's understandings of obesity and its relation to the risk of diabetes: a qualitative study...
links for 2008-09-19
Jacob Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:30:26 -0000
USATF - America's Running Routes - View Route Run It. Map It. Share It. - A Database of America's Running Routes. Map and measure your favorite running routes and save them to the country's largest searchable database of running...
medpundit
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:22:00 -0000
Year's End, Blog's End: I've been making my annual year end inventory - deciding what to keep and what to toss. It's become obvious in the past several months that this blog is one of the things that it's time to toss. This will be the last post for Medpundit. Truly. Wishing you all the best in 2008 and the years beyond.Click to enlarge
Pilgrim Medicine
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:31:00 -0000
Thanksgiving Remembrance: Mayflower Medicine.
Genetic Prejudice
noreply@blogger.com (sydney) Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:02:00 -0000
Any Excuse Will Do: Any excuse to justifying prejudice, or to stir up fear mongering of what may come: At the same time, genetic information is slipping out of the laboratory and into everyday life, carrying with it the inescapable message that people of different races have different DNA. Ancestry tests tell customers what percentage of their genes are from Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas. The heart-disease drug BiDil is marketed exclusively to African-Americans, who seem genetically predisposed to respond to it. Jews are offered prenatal tests for genetic disorders rarely found in other ethnic groups.Such developments are providing some of the first tangible benefits of the genetic revolution. Yet some social critics fear they may also be giving long-discredited racial prejudices a new potency. The notion that race is more than skin deep, they fear, could undermine principles of equal treatment and opportunity that have relied on the presumption that we are all fundamentally equal."We are living through an era of the ascendance of biology, and we have to be very careful," said Henry Louis Gates Jr., director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University. "We will all be walking a fine line between using biology and allowing it to be abused."We have been living in an era of ascendant biology since Darwin. Remember eugenics? Jews have been offered prenatal testing long before the mapping of the human genome, as have African-Americans. But prenatal screening is not quite the same as the eugenics movement heyday. So why the hyperventilating? It turns out that the Times is taking its cue from blogs commenting on studies studies like this. Well, if the blogs say that genetics justifies prejudice, it must be true! I never thought I would see the day that the New York Times took that attitude on its front pages. It must be part of their plan to join the internet age. Here's the part that's gotten the Times convinced that genetics is going to bring back the days of institutionalized prejudice:There exists a publicly available gene database, The HapMap Project, that contains random samples of genetic sequences from people in China, Japan, Nigeria, and people in the United States with European ancestry. It’s now possible to search the HapMap database for genes that have been linked with intelligence in published scientific studies. In this manner, we can determine if high intelligence genes occur with greater or lesser frequency in the various races.Now, here’s an interesting point. If even a single gene correlated with intelligence occurs with different frequencies in the different races, this alone proves that there are racial differences in intelligence. How is that? Well, the egalitarian theory holds that every race has identical intelligence. Therefore, whatever genes there are that affect intelligence, they must be distributed exactly equally in all human races. Once even a small race difference is proven, the egalitarian theory is proven false. At that point, it’s only a matter of determining which race has the higher average intelligence based on the genetic evidence.Oh, please. Here's a take home lesson for everyone on the science of genetics, and one that should never be forgotten - these studies are about associations of genes with traits, not the concrete coding of a trait by a given gene. Just because a locus on a chromosome can be found more often in people with schizophrenia than in the general population doesn't mean that everyone with that genetic code in that spot will have schizophrenia, anymore than it means that every sibling of a schizophrenic will have the disease. Ditto with intelligence. Ditto, too, with cancer risks and most other traits and diseases human genome mapping is linking to genes. The essence of a man is not written into his DNA. Here's another important point to remember - our science is still young and uncertain:These genomewide association studies have been able to examine interpatient differences in inherited genetic variability at an unprecedented level of resolution, thanks to the development of microarrays, or chips, capable of assessing more than 500,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a single sample. This "SNP-chip" technology capitalizes on a catalogue of common human genetic variations that is provided by the HapMap Project, which was made possible by the completion of the consensus human-genome sequence.......The main problem with this strategy is that, because of the high cost of SNP chips, most studies are somewhat constrained in terms of the number of samples and thus have limited power to generate P values as small as 10–7. In addition, most variants identified recently have been associated with modest relative risks (e.g., 1.3 for heterozygotes and 1.6 for homozygotes), and many true associations are not likely to exceed P values as extreme as 10–7 in an initial study. On the other hand, a "statistically significant" finding in an underpowered study is more likely to be a false positive result due to chance than is such a finding in an adequately powered study, and "statistically significant" associations could be attributable to systematic bias (e.g., from confounding due to ethnic ancestry, also known as population stratification). Thus, the sine qua non for belief in any specific result from a genomewide association study is not the strength of the P value in the initial study, but the consistency and strength of the association across one or more large-scale replication studies. Robust replication should permit the identification of true positive results and the weeding out of false positive results.In other words, take these genome studies that link intelligence and race just as about as seriously as you would take studies linking intelligence to sex, or that predict elections with brain scans.UPDATE: Best of the Web draws an important distinction:Note that "the presumption that we are all fundamentally equal" is quite different from the notion "that all races are equal." The former is a moral principle, a premise about the basic dignity of every individual; the latter is an empirical presumption about group averages in measurable traits. Someone with an IQ of 80 is as human as someone with an IQ of 120; and this is so regardless of whether the average IQ of one race is different from that of another.What worries people like those in the Times story is that racial differences in IQ or other traits seem to lend empirical support to racist theories. But those theories are qualitatively wrong, so that no empirical evidence could make them right. If all individuals are of equal dignity and worth regardless of IQ, then a group is not fundamentally superior or inferior to another group by virtue of differences in average IQ.It seems that some very smart people mistakenly think that intelligence is a measure of fundamental worth. Maybe they're a little too impressed with their own brilliance.
Sites:
American Family Physician: A peer reviewed journal of the American Academy of Family PhysiciansArchives of Family Medicine: Web site for Archives of Family Medicine.
CFP: Canadian Family Practice: Monthly publication on family medicine, with critical appraisals. From the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
Journal of Family Medicine: Reviews advances in family medicine, primary care, obstetrics, gynecology, pediatrics, and medicine.
MedBioWorld: Links to Interdisciplinary Medical & Family Medicine Journals
The Journal of Family Practice: Topics include Family Medicine and Practice, Family Doctor, Physician Web Sites, Family Practice Residency and Family Practice Certification.
This directory is based on the Open Directory and may have been modified
